Profile
fast file site fast file site Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream. Faster than the next cloud. About 20%. Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem). Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible. File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned). Webhard It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud. Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality. Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder. You will need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos. According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.*** It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point) It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services. You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly. Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again. The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level. Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive) Google Drive It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK. It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users. It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail. Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite). Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. 웹하드 순위 You can flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me. There are the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment. Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less. There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy. If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?) Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?) Dropbox It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading. There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc. The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive. The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB. The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files. The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt. Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards... You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents. Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. The dropbox itself can't be documented. There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely. Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file. File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small. Slow. Not paid people. Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test. The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only. In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive). It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.*** Skydrive The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged. The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference. It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
Forum Role: Participant
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0