Profile
file down site donwload site When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud should be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream. Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%. When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem). Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible. File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned). Webhard It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud. In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality. When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder. You will need to share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos. According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.*** It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point) It has a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services. You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly. Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again. The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level. Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive) Google Drive It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK. It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users. It is easy to connect with other Google services such as Gmail. Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite). Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me. There are the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment. Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less. There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy. If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?) Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?) Dropbox It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading. There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc. The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive. The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from the free account may be the largest. 300MB. The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files. The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt. Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards... You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents. Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. The dropbox itself cannot be documented. There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely. Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file. File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. p2p 순위 However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small. Slow. Not paid people. Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test. The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only. In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive). It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.*** Skydrive The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged. The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference. It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
Forum Role: Participant
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0