Profile
Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webdisk Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard. Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc's server resources with other users. 웹하드 순위 Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar. The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low. However, you should pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers. There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains. Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic. It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it's a company. It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data. Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden. It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment. If you already had an internet site or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site. OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards. By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer. The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which can be fully built in Soho, so the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot. It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system. Rental vs. Construction. Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows one to download files on the internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that the use of web hard has become common. But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there have been many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now. The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it. In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included. NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP. Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server. Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.
Forum Role: Participant
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0